Rhetoric from Trump administration officials appears to be shifting more toward reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), rather than axing it entirely. While the shift has been more apparent as the administration faces questions about the disaster agency in light of deadly floods in Texas,

Just days into his second term, President Trump said he was going to recommend that the Federal Emergency Management Agency “go away,” dismissing the agency as bloated and ine

The administration supported search and rescue operations in Kerr County, Texas, after at least 120 people died and dozens went missing in deadly floods.

The Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program aimed to distribute billions of federal dollars to state and local governments to protect against climate-related disasters, but the administration now says it was “wasteful and ineffective.

President Donald Trump visited Texas to assess flood damage as his administration considers significant changes to FEMA.

Rhetoric from Trump administration officials appears to be shifting more toward reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), rather than axing it entirely. While the shift has been

Some FEMA officials claim President Trump's cost-cutting policies are to blame for the delayed response to the disastrous Texas floods.

The Trump administration does not have immediate plans to abolish FEMA, though discussions on its future are underway. Changes may focus on rebranding, emphasizing state roles. Despite Trump's initial stance,

As Trump heads to Texas to see the impact of last week’s deadly flash floods, the White House has backed away from plans to abolish FEMA, officials said.

President Trump has moved aggressively to reopen long-settled issues and to dismantle long-established institutions as he tries to return to what he considers better times.

Congressional Democrats are questions DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's new FEMA rules, which they believe is making disaster response harder.

The Trump administration destroyed 500 tons of emergency food meant for malnourished children, costing $1 million. The decision, linked to USAID cuts, has sparked criticism and concerns over U.S. humanitarian aid.