The Trump administration’s arguments against birthright citizenship for all are ahistorical, and make no sense when ...

The birthright citizenship legal challenge at the Supreme Court is not a minor adjustment to immigration policy, but a ...

Norman Wong didn’t know his family’s history for most of his life. Now, the 75-year-old retired carpenter is fighting to save birthright citizenship and his great-grandfather’s legacy. His ...

The arguments hinged on a procedural question about the powers of lower courts that conservatives appeared sympathetic to, ...

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday about President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship and significantly limit the power of federal courts to slow his agenda – a case that ...

The government doesn’t seem to know how it will implement this massive change in policy.

The post Trump's Case Against Birthright Citizenship Is a Constitutional Loser appeared first on Reason.com.

Nationwide injunctions have become more prevalent over the past 20 years, with lawyers "forum shopping" for judges friendly ...

If ever there was a case for nationwide injunctions, this is it. Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional on its face.

It’s been a law of the land since 1868. We break down Trump’s executive order, the significance of the Supreme Court stepping in, and why it matters ...

The question before the justices was whether a single district court judge has the power to block a policy across the country ...

President Donald Trump's executive order purporting to abolish birthright citizenship for millions of U.S.-born children is an insult to the text, history, and original public meaning of the ...