The server encountered an error and could not complete your request. If the problem persists, please contact us using the ...

It is stunning that the Ninth Circuit paid no attention to U.S. history and how rare it is for a president to federalize a ...

The case stems from a dispute over parking spaces at a San Diego pizzeria that spiraled into cross claims of defamation, fake negative reviews, racial discrimination and First Amendment rights ...

But the legal battle with California Gov. Gavin Newsom continues Friday in a San Francisco district court room ...

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Mark Bennett of Honolulu, Eric Miller of Seattle, and Jennifer Sung of Portland — presided over the hearing remotely in a case simply titled Trump v. Newsom.

Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision overturning a trial court ruling that had invalidated President Trump's federalization of 4000 troops of the California ...

The federal appellate panel noted that historically states have been more willing to ban concealed weapons than openly ...

Federal appeals court allows Trump to retain command of National Guard in Los Angeles, ruling he likely exercised lawful authority despite failing to notify Gov. Gavin Newsom.

The legal battle over the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in California continued in a federal ...

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the cases during its 2025-2026 term, which begins Oct. 6, and issue its decision by next July.

The unanimous order from a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit is a victory for the president and allows for the continued deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard ...